Proficient Homework

CaseStudyGradingRubric3.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Topic,domainsandconcepts

35 to >31 pts

Advanced

Clearly addresses thetopic assigned, stays ontopic, evaluates alldomains,comprehensive incontent, uses terms andconcepts from reading,demonstrates clarity ofexpression. Statementsare supported by atleast 1 scholarly sourcepublished within the pastfive years, correctlycited throughout thenarrative.

31 to >28 pts

Proficient

Addresses the topicassigned, stays ontopic, evaluates mostdomains, discussescontent, uses termsand concepts fromreading, anddemonstrates clarity ofexpression. Statementsare supported by atleast 1 scholarly sourcepublished within thepast five years, cited atleast once in thenarrative.

28 to >0 pts

Developing

Does a poor to fair job ofaddressing the topicassigned, stays on topic,evaluates some domains,discusses content, doesnot use terms andconcepts from reading,does not demonstrateclarity of expression.Statements are notsupported by at least 1scholarly sourcepublished within the pastfive years and cited in thenarrative.

0 pts

Not Present

Failing.Student showsevidence ofrefusal orinability toprovide therequiredcontent.

35 pts

WorkHabits

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

Superior work in allareas. Studentconsistently exceedsminimal expectations inall areas regardingcontent analysis,synthesis, andevaluation of topics,participation, timeliness,and writing style.

27 to >24 pts

Proficient

Good work in mostareas. Studentdemonstrates minordeficiencies in someareas regardingcontent, analysis,writing style, and/orparticipation.

24 to >0 pts

Developing

Poor to fair work in mostareas. Student exhibitsneed for improvement inmost areas regardingcontent, analysis, writingstyle, and/or participation.

0 pts

Not Present

Failing.Student showsevidence ofrefusal orinability tomeet minimumstandards ofwork.

30 pts

Personalapplication

5 to >4 pts

Advanced

The student providesthorough applications asa result of his/herprofessional life.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

The student providesgood applications as aresult of his/herprofessional life.

3 to >0 pts

Developing

The student provides poorto fair applications as aresult of his/herprofessional life.

0 pts

Not Present

The studentprovides zeroapplications asa result ofhis/herprofessionallife.

5 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

APAFormatting

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

APA format followed,organizes content underAPA headings, no largefiller quotes, clearlydoes not plagiarize,clearly finds supportivereasons in reading andapplies them in the casestudy. APA-formattedreference list and in-textcitations are included.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

APA format followedmost of the time,headings containedsome errors, has nolarge filler quotes, doesnot plagiarize, findssupportive reasons inreading and appliesthem in the case study.Reference list andin-text citations contain2 – 5 errors.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

APA format inconsistentthroughout; missingheadings; some large fillerquotes; does notplagiarize; finds fewsupportive reasons inreading and applies themin the case study;reference list, in-textcitations, and headingscontain more than 5errors.

0 pts

Not Present

APA formatwas notfollowed; largefiller quotespresent; doesnot plagiarize;does not findsupportivereasons inreading orapply them inthe case study;reference listand in-textcitations arenot included.

10 pts

Spelling,GrammarandMechanics

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The Case Study beginswith a title page and wastyped in 12-point TimesNew Roman fonts on allpages; all pages weredouble-spaced; 1-inchmargins on all four sideswere used.Correct grammar andpunctuation werepresent throughout.Correct spelling andspacing were presentthroughout.The paper was typed ina formal style andwritten in the thirdperson.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Some errors with thetitle page, 12-pointTimes New Romanfonts, double-spacing;or 1-inch margins werepresent.Some errors with errorswith one or more of thefollowing were present:• Grammar, and/or;• Punctuation, and/or,• Spelling, and/or;• Spacing.Some errors withformal style and/or thirdperson were present.1 – 3 errors werepresent.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Significant errors with thetitle page, 12-point TimesNew Roman fonts,double-spacing; align textleft; extra spacing; or1-inch margins werepresent.Significant errors with oneor more of the followingwere present:• Grammar, and/or;• Punctuation, and/or,• Spelling, and/or;• Spacing.Significant errors withformal style and/or thirdperson were present.More than 3 errors werepresent.

0 pts

Not Present

Errors withspelling,grammar,and/ormechanicswere sopervasive thatthe readabilityand level ofscholarship ofthe paper weresubstantiallyreduced.

10 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

Pagecount

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

At least 3 completepages of originalgraduate-level analysis,evaluation, anddiscussion (plus titlepage, reference page,and tables or figures).

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

At least 2.9 pages oforiginal graduate-levelanalysis, evaluation,and discussion (plustitle page, referencepage, and tables orfigures).

7 to >0 pts

Developing

2.0 – 2.8 pages of originalgraduate-level analysis,evaluation, anddiscussion (plus titlepage, reference page,and tables or figures).

0 pts

Not Present

Less than 2pagessubmitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320

The post CaseStudyGradingRubric3.pdf appeared first on proficient homework.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Our Experts can help. Use the coupon code SAVE30 to get your first order at 30% off!